Comments on: Requirements for a Semantic Web Framework http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441 Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:45:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Eyal Oren http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1591 Eyal Oren Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:13:10 +0000 http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1591 Andraz: I don't know anything comparable on Python, unfortunately. Andraz: I don’t know anything comparable on Python, unfortunately.

]]> By: Andraz Tori http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1421 Andraz Tori Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:13:24 +0000 http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1421 Eyal: hi, thank you for your info. This really is pretty interesting piece of software, you know about anything similar for Python? O/R stuff is getting done, now let's get to MVC ? :) Oh, and this is not important only for web. Actually many people are doing non-web things with those 'standard' frameworks, including me/us at Zemanta. bye andraz Eyal:

hi, thank you for your info. This really is pretty interesting piece of software, you know about anything similar for Python?

O/R stuff is getting done, now let’s get to MVC ? :)

Oh, and this is not important only for web. Actually many people are doing non-web things with those ’standard’ frameworks, including me/us at Zemanta.

bye
andraz

]]> By: Eyal Oren http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1351 Eyal Oren Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:21:51 +0000 http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1351 Andraz, you're right: SW apps share lots of functionality with ordinary Web apps, and should reuse Web frameworks as far as possible. I've been trying to leverage Rails for SW apps in ActiveRDF (http://activerdf.org), which you could call an ORM for RDF(S) data; see also this IEEE publication at http://eyaloren.org/pubs/ieeesw2007.pdf Andraz, you’re right: SW apps share lots of functionality with ordinary Web apps, and should reuse Web frameworks as far as possible. I’ve been trying to leverage Rails for SW apps in ActiveRDF (http://activerdf.org), which you could call an ORM for RDF(S) data; see also this IEEE publication at http://eyaloren.org/pubs/ieeesw2007.pdf

]]> By: andraz@zemanta.com http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1341 andraz@zemanta.com Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:36:15 +0000 http://blog.larkc.eu/?p=441#comment-1341 Hi, have to say this might be a nice feature-set basically describes "semantic-toolbox", but it does not describe a framework. Framework means tightly knit solution that brings standard coding patterns in sync with a specific new features. To get a good feature set, take what's written in the article and add important features of modern web frameworks such as Django or Rails. Where's semantic equivalent to ORM? Where's semantic-based solution for MVC? Where are good documentation about semantic DRY? Where's semantic scaffolding? Actually this seems like a really good project that will get a lot of spotlight if someone does it right. bye andraz Hi,

have to say this might be a nice feature-set basically describes “semantic-toolbox”, but it does not describe a framework.

Framework means tightly knit solution that brings standard coding patterns in sync with a specific new features.

To get a good feature set, take what’s written in the article and add important features of modern web frameworks such as Django or Rails. Where’s semantic equivalent to ORM? Where’s semantic-based solution for MVC? Where are good documentation about semantic DRY? Where’s semantic scaffolding?

Actually this seems like a really good project that will get a lot of spotlight if someone does it right.

bye
andraz

]]>